Evidence itself is hypothetical. বিজ্ঞানের চোখে এভিডেন্স ও হাইপোথিটিক্যাল।

============

”Sir Mujibur Rahman you were so right when you said evidence is arbitrary. When you made the statement I was stunned. How could bother Belal not understand it despite claiming to be a Science student is out of my mind. Anyway, want to say some:

Belal Bhai evidence are those signs which make us believe on reality or truthfulness of something.How are we gonna present evidences? Yes through our reason, through our sensory perception. So let me help you brother Belal to understand how aht sit Mujib said is correct. Reason- you must know reason has its basis on intuition or instinctive faith. The laws of science like Causation, uniformity of nature are based on intuitive faith. Albert Einstein said about cosmology, “There is no logical path to see these laws; only intuition resting on sympathetic understanding of experience can reach them”.

Suppose we are confronted with a brown rectangle table, which appears to be smooth to touch and produces a sound when rapped with finger. Now as regards color, it may, and indeed, it does differ different at least in intensity to different persons according to the distance from the table and angle vision.

Even from the same point ,the color may be different to different people as per the amount of light is concerned, their retinas are consuming and the reflections even upon the health of thier retina and their neurotransmitters again it ll depend either they are seeing with naked eyes or through colored glass.Whatever it is, the table exists but the conception to believe about the table shall change. Thus, rationality varies.When rationality varies, it is lost in emptiness.

Similarly in the case of texture. The table, which appears smooth and even to the naked eye, will prove rough and uneven under microscope. From all these situations it is evident that the real table, if there is any, is not the same as we can immediately see. Thus, Russell asked two questions. Is there any such thing as a physical object: and if so, what is its nature?

Lol the ones those who solely depend on their senses are living in illusions. I shall refer to see the optical illusions. Bertrand Russell admits it illusory dream. Even Berkley, Leibnitz had assumed independent existence of external objects. The quantum mechanics is hypothetical idea and can be called as relativity. Thus, do not talk about reason.

Things appear different from different scales of observers.

That’s is why Charles Eugene Guye said, “It is the scale of observation which creates a phenomenon". There is one immense harmonious phenomenon on a scale which in general escapes man because of the structure of his brain, a structure that divides things into arbitrary compartments cutting them into their antithetical parts”. Cral Jung and Bergson admitted it.

Take time to read.”

By Mehreena Shehrash.